Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
The scatter fraction was 33.5%%.
The system scatter fraction was 7.1% for the mouse phantom.
d Scatter fraction (in %) for the same range of activities.
The scatter fraction was within a <3% agreement.
However, differences of scatter fraction for three detectors were very similar.
For mouse- and rat-sized phantoms, the scatter fraction was 10.7% and 16.1%, respectively.
The sensitivity and scatter fraction were 3.8 cps/kBq and 37.3%, respectively.
For the small animal PET scanner, the scatter fraction increased linearly with the phantom diameter.
NEMA NECR (a) and NEMA scatter fraction (b) for the Biograph mCT and mMR system.
The scatter fraction is approximately the same for both systems for peak NECRs.
NECR and scatter fraction, for a range of activity concentrations, are presented in Fig. 2.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com