Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Image files generated after scanning were analyzed using NimbleScan Software Version 2.4.
Similar(59)
They were subsequently scanned on a GeneChip® 3000 Scanner (Affymetrix), and the data from each scan were analyzed using GeneChip® Resequencing Analysis Software, Version 4.0 (GSEQ v4.0, Affymetrix).
CT scans were analyzed using density contour software.
Scans were analyzed using GenePix Pro versions 4.0.1.9 and 4.1.1.4.
Scans were analyzed using Hologic Discovery software (version 12.1).
All scans were analyzed using InVivoScope processing software (Mediso, Boston, MA, USA).
[F]HX4 PET/CT scans were analyzed using an Inveon Research Workplace (Edition 4.0.0.3; Siemens, Germany).
Event-related scans were analyzed using the general linear model and the "Finite Impulse Response" approach.
Scans were analyzed using encore2007 software version 11.40.004 (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI).
For intraobserver variation, the 3 × 3 scans were analyzed using the interclass correlation coefficient.
Scans were analyzed using SkyScan CTAnalyser software, version 1.9.3.0 (SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com