Mean first scan success rates were higher during the practice session than when completing the survey questions (t(23) = 7.82, p = 0.001).
The responsiveness of the scanning system, expressed as first scan success rate, was less than perfect, with approximately one-third of first scans requiring a rescan to successfully capture the data entry.
First scan success rate expressed as a percentage was computed individually as the number of questions that a participant successfully answered with one pass of the barcode scanning system out of a total of 16 questions.
Mean first scan success rates increased significantly from 68% in the first round of barcode entry to 79% (t(17) = 6.19, p = 0001) for those completing a second round of barcode entry (BCE2).
The responsiveness of the scanning system for the practice barcode entries, first round of barcode entries (BCE1), and second round of barcode entries (BCE2), is compared in Figure 3, where first and second scan success rates are provided for the 16 questions.
Robert Plomin spent years scanning children for success genes, but never found them, reports Jones.
The same patient underwent PET/CT scanning to evaluate success of this intervention.
After scanning, participants reported their degree of success at maintaining the original stimuli without changing them (rating 1 5, maximum success at not changing items = 5: scenes mean 4.16, SD 0.16; objects mean 4.6, SD 0.1); although the success rating was high for both conditions, it was significantly higher for objects (t(24) = 3.38, P = 0.003).
At least 6 days separated PET scanning and sacrificing for the determination of monoamine level in the striatum, in the meantime we performed the post-scan processes including reconstruction, image analysis, kinetic analysis, and metabolite analysis to confirm the successes of PET scanning.
Scanning during sleep resulted in a high success percentage of 93% in young children 2.5 4.5 years old [ 17].
