Sentence examples for scanning did not differ from inspiring English sources

In a first analysis, the pupil response during the z-string-scanning task and that obtained from the artificial eye model were compared: The pupil response measured during z-string scanning did not differ from the pupil response obtained by the artificial eye model (at 11 different horizontal gaze positions; one-sample t-tests, all ts < 1).

Ratings of tastiness of food pictures during MRI scanning did not differ between placebo and exenatide.

For each individual rat however, the specific activity at the start of the scan did not differ much between the scans obtained at different time points.

There were no other significant second or third order interactions of Time with Hemisphere, or Surgery, indicating that within-session temporal variation across pCASL scans did not differ between cerebral hemispheres, either in pre-surgical or post-surgical scanning sessions following either left or right TME.

Additionally, the results of our QTL scans did not differ when including age as a covariate (data not shown).

Patients with a progressive change in the scans did not differ significantly from those without a change in MRI classification regarding follow-up time, time interval between MRIs, or changes in whole-blood Cr and Co levels between assessments.

(Representative CT-images of the lung and brain are presented in Figure 1) Mean brain tissue density seen in CT scans did not differ significantly between the two groups (Table 3).

After internal investigation we strongly believe that missing data on gestational age, mean gestational sac diameter, crown-rump length, second scan, and interval between scans did not differ systematically from women with complete data, which would imply that the omission of women with missing data would not bias results.

However, those scanned did not differ in terms of joint count (swollen joint count mean = 3.9 vs 3.1; p = 0.11), HAQ score (mean = 1.02 vs 1.04; p = 0.82), or CRP level (mean = 12.3 mg/L vs 13.3; p = 0.59), from those who did not providing some reassurance against selection bias though we can not exclude this.

The SD of non-aerated tissue (SDatelect) and the fraction of non-aerated tissue per ROI (SD%atelect) over all slices of the spiral scans did not differ between the two models of ALI (SDatelect: 4.3 versus 3.9; SD%atelect: 0.13 versus 0.13, for HCl-induced versus OA-induced ALI).

In this study, scanning strategy did not differ significantly among the facial image conditions, which suggested that subjects scanned the images with analogous strategies irrespective of the kind of face.