Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Scanner volume productivity was found to be negatively correlated to the time of day.
Analysis of the data showed that hourly scanner volume productivity was significantly higher during the first shift than the second shift of the day; 123 and 114 m3 h−1 respectively.
The current findings for the processor volume productivity and the scanner piece count productivity are in agreement with those findings of Rose et al. ([2007]) but not for scanner volume productivity.
The scanner volume productivity results, but not the processor volume productivity results or the scanner piece count results, from the current study of an off-forest central processing yard in New Zealand agree, however, with the findings of a recent study of on-forest mechanised harvesting operations in Chile.
The standard clinical chest CT protocol at our institution utilized a 64-row multidetector CT scanner (Aquilion 64; Toshiba America Medical Systems, CA) or a 4-row multidetector CT scanner (Volume Zoom; Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany).
Similar(55)
To confirm this, when scanner volumes corresponding to eye movements were regressed out of analyses, the results remained unchanged.
With a faster scanner, contrast volume can also be decreased by using a higher iodine concentration [12].
The femora image was acquired using four row multi slices CT scanner (Somatom, Volume Zoom, Siemens) operating at 120 kV and 90 mAs.
Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed using a four-row multislices CT scanner (Somatom, Volume Zoom, Siemens) and were conducted using 120 kV and 90 mAs.
A four-row multislice CT scanner (Somatom, Volume Zoom, SIEMENS) set with fixed scanning parameters of 3 mm slice thickness, recon increment of 1.5 mm, collimation of 1.25 mm, 12 mm table feed per rotation, 90 mAs and 120 kV were used in this study.
Spiral CT scanner captures larger volume tissue in a short scan time.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com