Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The optimal values for the scanner samples were 80 for the window size and 1.15 for the bias.
Similar(59)
Samples were scanned using Nextec Hawk 3D laser scanner and Roland Dr Picza needle scanner at between 10 and 50 µm resolution, depending on the size of the sample.
Gels with Oregon Green labeled samples were scanned on a Typhoon scanner (GE Healthcare, UK) with Cy3-DIGE filter setup.
Y-TZP samples were digitized using the 3Shape D700 scanner (3S, DeguDent), which uses a laser-based optical scanning method.
The samples were finally transferred to a microarray scanner for further LSC analysis.
Stained samples were scanned using a Canon flatbed scanner.
All of samples were scanned using a micro-CT scanner (Inveon Micro-CT, Siemens, Germany).
Samples were read using a SE-250 scanner (Celm®, Barueri, Brazil).
Samples were then scanned in an Affymetrix 3000 scanner.
The RNA samples were hybridized and scanned by Agilent Microarray Scanner (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA).
Samples were hybridized, washed and scanned with an Affymetrix Scanner.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com