Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
Temporo-parietal hypometabolism pattern on cerebral FDG-PET scan (score = 1 for at least one visual rater).
The association between typical scan score (TSS) and overall or individual methods of progression was not significant using VCC or ECC (p>0.05).
An ROC regression model was fitted to evaluate the influence of disease severity and atypical retardation patterns (typical scan score [TSS]) on the diagnostic performance of the SLP parameters for both methods.GDx ECC performed significantly better than GDx VCC in glaucoma detection in patients with more severe atypical retardation patterns.
The takeover delay (p < 0.02), the GCS (p < 0.01), the presence of pupillary anomaly (p < 0.01), the presence of associated lesions (p = 0.01), the ISS score (p < 0.01) and the CT scan score (p < 0.01) were considered as outcome indicators in univariate analysis.
Each image had a quality scan score of 8 or greater.
Only images with a scan score index (SSI –signal strength index) of more than 35 were included in our study.
Similar(41)
This feature, which allows busy readers to scan scores of headlines without visiting a new page or launching a full-blown RSS reader, has been retained and updated.
Serum COMP levels correlated with the total-body bone scan scores (r = 0.188, P = 0.018) and with a factor composed of the bone scan scores in the shoulders, spine, lateral knees, and sacroiliac joints (P = 0.0004).
To control for within-subject correlations of knee data, generalized linear modeling was used in the correlation of the bone scan scores with the COMP levels.
Synovial fluid COMP levels correlated most strongly with the early-phase knee bone scan scores (P = 0.0003), even after adjustment for OA severity according to the late-phase bone scan scores (P = 0.015), as well as synovial fluid volumes (P < 0.0001).
Significant TF scan scores of these gene promoters infer ERα non-genomic action (NGA).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com