Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
A recent study by Mahalik et al. [ 18] stated that a CT scan could provide good anatomic delineation, but might not help in surgical decision making.
Similar(59)
For a recent paper, Dr. Daugman reviewed 9.1 million scans from trials in four countries and concluded that even just using 70percentt of numbers generated by scans could provide "extraordinarily compelling evidence of identity".
In the new study, however, researchers led by Dr. Gregory W. Albers of Stanford found that M.R.I. scans could provide information that makes it clearer which patients will benefit from clot busters.
Only fast volumetric scanning could provide the full lateral motion information, which is needed for a lateral motion correction.
Even though follow-up CT scans could provide useful information about cerebral edema [ 13- 15], our results showed that the initial CT finding was not useful in making the HSES diagnosis.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate if a commercially available noise-reducing Pixon-algorithm applied on whole body bone scintigraphy acquired with half the standard scan-time could provide the same clinical information as full scan-time non-processed images.
Doppler OCT B-scan imaging could provide precise topographic locations of RAMs.
Abdominal and thoracic CT scan or MRI could provide additional information about the stage of the disease and can exclude the presence of abscess or fluid collection in abdominal cavity.
When combined with e.g. a sub-wavelength grating structure (such as in the far-field superlens design previously proposed [1]) or a fast near-field scanning probe, it could provide a means for fast fluorescent imaging with sub-diffraction limit resolution.
Gathering other forms of data, such as those obtained by field observations or scanning organizational documents, could provide complementary data.
In addition, the later scan (180 min after injection) could provide more accurate prediction of chemoresistance than early scan (30 min after injection) [ 47].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com