Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
Alexander [1] suggested that the scaling of efficiency may also scale linearly with Mb in flight.
Therefore, no scaling of efficiency (Emech, CM/Emet) with Mb was evident within each size group.
Hence, scaling of efficiency is likely to be more complex than a simple linear relationship across body sizes.
Irrespective of the accuracy or otherwise of the force plate technique, however, the previous conclusion of mass dependent scaling of efficiency in locomotion [1], [2] is based upon it.
Both the mass specific metabolic energetic cost and mechanical cost of transport decreases with increasing Mb in both data sets signifying that there is no scaling of efficiency within each size range.
Of course, Emech, CM does not include a measurement of total mechanical energy – for example it ignores internal sources – but crucially the tenet of body size dependent scaling of efficiency is based upon this measure [1], [2].
Similar(50)
In order to build a scale of efficiency, we select a few algorithms that solve the TOL efficiently in different conditions (a priori information or not, bounded vs. unbounded memory) and we determine their patterns of variation.
Small-scale gasifiers especially for non-woody biomass; highly flexible motor engines and fuel cells; highly efficient heat distribution systems; intelligent system controllers Depending on the scale of efficiency the systems will be available in 5 to 15 years; market integration will very much depend on economical conditions.
You are thinking about scales of efficiency and space to do it.
The debate about the potential scale of efficiency savings matters because, aside from environmental benefits, it has a direct bearing on the economy.
The Emech, data supporting this, however, are based upon theoretical models and scaling analyses [20] and not solely empirical data, and therefore the exact scaling pattern of efficiency in flight is yet to be determined.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com