Sentence examples for scales were assessed using from inspiring English sources

To achieve that goal, the victim and bully scales were assessed using polytomous item response theory (IRT).

Differences between samples in the categorical demographic variables were assessed using chi-square tests, while mean differences in age and the symptom severity scales were assessed using one-way ANOVAs.

Internal reliabilities of all scales were assessed using Cronbach's alpha.

Reliability statistics of the scales were assessed using the Cronbach alpha.

Correlations between MYMOP2 scales and W-BQ12 scales were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficients (rs) as shown in Table 3.

These scales were assessed using the International Obesity Task Force age-specific cut-off points for BMI, corresponding to a BMI of 25 and 30 for adults [ 42].

Reliability for these two scales was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, comparing the respective component domains.

The internal consistency of the PAPA scales was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.

Factorial validity of the scales was assessed using principle components analysis.

The internal consistency of the scales was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and ranged from 0.76 to 0.91.

Dimensionality of the scales was assessed using independent t-tests to compare person estimates derived from the two most disparate subsets of scale items [ 35].