Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
It provides easy-to-read results and information at different scales of interpretation.
Similar(59)
According to Lewis' scale of interpretation of estimation accuracy [34], any forecast with a MAPE value of less than 10%% can be considered highly accurate, 11 20 % is good, 21 50 % is reasonable and 51%% or more is inaccurate.
Although it is possible to calculate indices of clients' functional (i.e. activities of daily living [ADL]), cognitive and emotional status from MDS-HC items, we chose not to present the adjusted models including these scales because of interpretation difficulties due to collinearity between these measures (and other correlates of interest) and the single attributes comprising the HUI2 [ 26].
Michelle Borkin and co-workers at Harvard University recently found that a diverging scale increased accuracy of interpretation relative to the rainbow scale in the case of arterial shearing images [ 1], challenging the legitimacy of using rainbow scales in this field.
Schmidt's depiction puts another thumb on the scale of that interpretation.
The reprioritization of symptomatic scales enables interpretation of HRQoL levels and changes and impact of treatments and disease on HRQoL.
However, means are presented in arithmetic scale for ease of interpretation.
Because of their distributional properties, adducts were log transformed but means are presented in arithmetic scale for ease of interpretation.
Standardized regression coefficients (with 95% confidence limits) were converted to the original variable scale for ease of interpretation by multiplication with the raw data standard deviation of the target variable within the respective data.
These model outputs are shown on the probability scale for ease of interpretation in figures 1 and 2. Little evidence of a cross-level interaction in women or older age groups was found for either excess consumption or binge drinking.
The individual responses to the 34 items were summed and averaged for a total score and then transformed to a 0-100 scale for ease of interpretation, with higher scores indicating better IBS-specific QOL.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com