Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
In Section 4, we will conduct a large scale of random simulations to demonstrate the performance of the improved LLL algorithm with fixed complexity and compare it with the other four algorithms.
This section will argue that the time scale of random fluctuations of the dynamic scattering component may provide an indicator of capillary velocity.
Key factors that affect network response are the time scale of random fluctuations, amplitude of the variation, and the structure of the feedback loop.
Secondly, we propose that the time scale of random fluctuations in the dynamic scattering component are related to red blood cell velocity.
We propose to use the time scale of random fluctuations as a metric of capillary velocity, which we correlate against direct velocity measurements obtained via two-photon microscopy.
The method requires, firstly, isolation of the dynamic scattering component from the static scattering component, and secondly, characterization of the time scale of random fluctuations of the dynamic scattering component.
Similar(54)
The LMS-type sparse channel estimation methods have a common drawback of sensitivity to the scaling of random training signal.
In addition, since sparse LMS-based channel estimation methods have a common drawback of sensitivity to scaling of random training signal, it is very hard to choose a proper learning rate to achieve a robust estimation performance [21].
The research motivation originated from the fact that LMS-based channel estimation methods are sensitive to the scaling of random training signal and easily causing the estimation performance unstable.
Furthermore, quantitative assessment of the boundary network topology shows that the special grain boundary fraction is a poor predictor of network topology, but that the higher-order correlation derived from triple junction distributions can successfully describe the length scales of random boundary clusters.
The individual velocity components were created by appropriate scaling of random numbers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com