Sentence examples for scale of probability from inspiring English sources

The scale of probability and impact has five discrete classes between very low and very high.

The first axiom sets the scale of probability, from 0 to 1, which we can think of as running from 0% probability to 100% probability.[2] The second axiom places tautologies at the top of this scale: nothing is more probable than a tautology.[3] And finally, the third axiom tells us how to figure out the probability of a hypothesis by breaking it into parts.

The objective of this study is to propose to physicians in memory clinics a biologic scale of probabilities that the patient with cognitive impairments has an Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathologic process.

We have classified DBEs into three categories considering their occurrence probabilities and expected scales of their consequences.

In the Epworth Sleepiness Scale the women rank their probability of falling asleep on a scale of increasing probability from 0 to 3 for eight different situations.

The questionnaire asks the subject to rate his or her probability of falling asleep on a scale of increasing probability from 0 to 3 for eight different situations that most people engage in during their daily live.

This five-point rating scale for probability of cancer has the following classifications: 1 = normal or definitely benign; 2 = probably benign; 3 = indeterminate; 4 = probably malignant; 5 = malignant.

We identified occupations possibly involving formaldehyde exposure (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 1999), and an industrial hygienist created an a priori three-level scale for probability of exposure in these occupations [0 1, 1, and 2; see Supplemental Material, Table 2 (doi:10.1289/ehp.0900580. S1)].

The 6-min walking test (6MWD), arterial blood gas analysis, assessment of the MRC dyspnoea scale and calculation of probability of survival based on BODE score [ 23] completed the clinical investigations.

In FMEA however, the ordinal scales of severity, probability and detectability are multiplied to produce the RPN, which breaches the mathematical properties of the ordinal scales.

Finally, it assumes that the distribution of fitness effects is similar between TE insertions and non-synonymous mutations and doesn't consider the non-linear scaling of the probability of fixation of mildly deleterious alleles with effective population size [ 17].