Sentence examples for scale of interpretation from inspiring English sources

According to Lewis' scale of interpretation of estimation accuracy [34], any forecast with a MAPE value of less than 10%% can be considered highly accurate, 11 20 % is good, 21 50 % is reasonable and 51%% or more is inaccurate.

It provides easy-to-read results and information at different scales of interpretation.

Although it is possible to calculate indices of clients' functional (i.e. activities of daily living [ADL]), cognitive and emotional status from MDS-HC items, we chose not to present the adjusted models including these scales because of interpretation difficulties due to collinearity between these measures (and other correlates of interest) and the single attributes comprising the HUI2 [ 26].

Michelle Borkin and co-workers at Harvard University recently found that a diverging scale increased accuracy of interpretation relative to the rainbow scale in the case of arterial shearing images [ 1], challenging the legitimacy of using rainbow scales in this field.

However, means are presented in arithmetic scale for ease of interpretation.

Because of their distributional properties, adducts were log transformed but means are presented in arithmetic scale for ease of interpretation.

Standardized regression coefficients (with 95% confidence limits) were converted to the original variable scale for ease of interpretation by multiplication with the raw data standard deviation of the target variable within the respective data.

These model outputs are shown on the probability scale for ease of interpretation in figures 1 and 2. Little evidence of a cross-level interaction in women or older age groups was found for either excess consumption or binge drinking.

The individual responses to the 34 items were summed and averaged for a total score and then transformed to a 0-100 scale for ease of interpretation, with higher scores indicating better IBS-specific QOL.

A key distinction of our technique against multi-variate statistical methods [1] is compound-cognizant interpretation that preserves the identity of individual target peaks while extending the scale of peak-level interpretation to all peaks, target and non-target, within the ((GC times GC)) topography.

The utility of scales in actual practice may be decreased by practical and logistical factors, such as the time needed to administer the scale and the ease of interpretation of results, as well as by ethical concerns, related to the identification of children with mental disorders without the ability to provide them with adequate treatment [ 97].