Here we show this plot on the standard deviation scale for ease of viewing, and with the global estimate of ϕ ^ = 0.131 as estimated via the edgeR function [ 16] in R over all genes.
These model outputs are shown on the probability scale for ease of interpretation in figures 1 and 2. Little evidence of a cross-level interaction in women or older age groups was found for either excess consumption or binge drinking.
Standardized regression coefficients (with 95% confidence limits) were converted to the original variable scale for ease of interpretation by multiplication with the raw data standard deviation of the target variable within the respective data.
We present the scores for the 13-items on a 100-point scale for ease of comparison.
Each item in the EXACT is scored on a 5- or 6-point ordinal scale, with a total score based on all 14 items transformed to a 0 100 scale for ease of use (lower scores indicate better status) [10].
However, means are presented in arithmetic scale for ease of interpretation.
Because of their distributional properties, adducts were log transformed but means are presented in arithmetic scale for ease of interpretation.
Global and composite scores were transformed to a 0 100 scale for ease of comparison as reported elsewhere [ 25].
The scale scores are presented both in raw form and transformed to a 0 100 scale for ease of comparison across scales.
