Sentence examples for scale of difference from inspiring English sources

Watson said: "To those who feel alarmed by the scale of difference between the old world and the new I say this: There is only one Labour".

That is the scale of difference an elected mayor can make and why that system is likely to spread to other parts of the country.

It's very hard to talk about the scale of difference his money is going to make".

For instance, thin-plate splines and relative-warp plots are graphic depictions of pattern and scale of difference in landmark points between putative ancestral and descendant types (e.g., Shott and Trail 2010).

One study only used a prospective methodological approach in the study design to power the sample size sufficiently to identify a scale of difference between brain and body temperature [ 19].

However, our results indicated that gene transcription divergence for this pathway was buffered during translation, so the genes in this pathway might not show the same scale of difference at the protein level.

Importantly, the duration of the relationship does not bias these conclusions since the scale of differences between preferences and actual partners' characteristics do not differ between a sub-sample including only couples with a relationship duration less than the median value and a sub-sample including only couples with a relationship duration equal or superior to 3 years (all p>0.19).

An in-depth analysis reveals the scale of differences among strains of common cell lines.

To compare the scale of differences between preferences and actual partners' characteristics between sexes, we standardized these measures by dividing them by standard deviations of partners' values for each trait within sexes (see methods).

The scale of differences observed here between eels of both origins is comparable and even more pronounced to what has been reported in other fish studies comparing the transcriptome of genetically distinct populations within a same species.

With 1000 evaluable subjects our simulations showed the study to have 87% power at the 5% significance level to detect a difference of 5% in P30, between 81% and 86%, which is of a magnitude considered clinically important and likely to occur with the expected scale of differences in imprecision between the equations [ 27].