Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(60)
Proponents say that current performance reviews are superficial and label virtually all teachers "satisfactory".
In New York City, principals are provided only two choices for rating teachers — "satisfactory" and "unsatisfactory" — and criteria for effectiveness include "housekeeping" and "personal appearance".
The old system, which everyone agreed was terrible, relied on spotty observations by administrators and found an overwhelming majority of teachers "satisfactory" whether or not they were performing in the job.
It is no wonder that 98 percent of teachers rate "satisfactory".
But for years states and districts have not even attempted to answer it, rating the vast majority of teachers as satisfactory.
"How is that, in California school districts, 98% of teachers get satisfactory ratings, but only 44% of students meet the English Language Arts literacy standards?
Programme appreciation among students and teachers was satisfactory.
Teachers have satisfactory prior first aid knowledge and are trained in science education.
I wish Ofsted would just award a standard of satisfactory to recognise that a teacher is competent.
The results were satisfactory as followed: Means for teacher and students were 4.15 and 4.23, and standard deviation for specialists and users were 0.645 and 0.714 respectively.
Internal consistency, test retest reliability, and inter-rater agreement are satisfactory for the parent and teacher versions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com