Exact(7)
THE RATINGS Extraordinary, Excellent, Very Good, Good, Satisfactory, Fair, Poor.
The evaluations, carried out by contractors, rated the impoundments as "satisfactory," "fair," "poor," or "unsatisfactory," terms commonly used in the field of dam safety.
Overall, 9 (6.6%), 50 (36.8%) and 77 (56.6%) respondents had satisfactory, fair or little awareness of the Helsinki Declaration.
These limits were also applied to define the Q-Score categories as very good, good, satisfactory, fair and poor (Additional file 1: Figure S3).
To achieve categorisation in our study, three diabetes specialists independently classified CGM profiles into groups of very good, good, satisfactory, fair, and poor metabolic control.
The groups of evaluated CGM profiles were used to define the Q-Score limits between categories of very good, good, satisfactory, fair, and poor glycaemic control.
Similar(53)
The good or excellent outcome was considered as satisfactory, while fair or poor outcome was unsatisfactory.
Excellent and good results were defined as satisfactory, whereas fair and poor results were defined as unsatisfactory.
The Q-Score was then calculated for all profiles, and limits were defined based on the categorised groups (<4.0, very good; 4.0 5.9, good; 6.0 8.4, satisfactory; 8.5 11.9, fair; and ≥12.0, poor).
RATINGS -- Poor, Fair, Satisfactory, Good, Very Good, Excellent, Extraordinary.
DATE OF REVIEW -- Sept. 28, 2003 RATINGS -- Poor, Fair, Satisfactory, Good, Very Good, Excellent, Extraordinary.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com