Further, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was satisfactory, with a value of 0.91.
Furthermore, the KMO measure of sampling adequacy was satisfactory, with a value of 0.935.
Furthermore, the Kaiser Meyer-Olkinn measure of sampling adequacy was satisfactory, with a value of 0.829.
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin's measure of sampling adequacy was satisfactory with 0.89, indicating that the sample was suitable for factor analysis.
The model adequacy was very satisfactory as the coefficient of determination was 0.94.
This method was efficient; only 20 experiments were necessary to assess these conditions and model adequacy was very satisfactory, as the coefficient of determination was 0.9560.
This method was efficient; only 28 experiments were necessary to assess these conditions, and model adequacy was very satisfactory, as coefficient of determination was 0.9558.
In order to evaluate sampling adequacy for performing a satisfactory factor analysis, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO) and Bartlett's tests also were calculated.
In order to evaluate sampling adequacy to perform a satisfactory factor analysis, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO) and Bartlett test was calculated.
Although all of the criteria used to predict successful extubation are generally satisfactory before extubation, none predict the adequacy of the airway once the endotracheal tube (ETT) has been removed [ 2].
In order to evaluate sampling adequacy to perform a satisfactory factor analysis, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) [ 35] measure of sampling adequacy for each item was examined using the anti-image of the correlation matrix, to determine whether all the measures of sampling were above the acceptable level of 0.5 [ 36].
