The evaluation should investigate if the programme had fulfilled its objectives of increased recruitment to medical research, in addition to the students' and supervisors' satisfaction of the programme, and unwanted differences between the universities.
The purpose of the evaluation was to investigate if the programme had fulfilled its objectives of increased recruitment to medical research, the students' and supervisors' satisfaction of the programme, and unwanted differences between the universities.
These high attendance levels, especially in the out-of-school methodology adopted in Zimbabwe, are reflected in the high levels of satisfaction for the programme recorded in the postintervention course evaluations by both boys and girls.
We evaluated the satisfaction of the antenatal programme intervention received by all participants.
Attendance at intervention sessions, self-reported use of skills to improve lifestyle behaviours and levels of satisfaction with the programme were all high.
In the framework, output is defined as the level of satisfaction with the programme expressed by the students and the number of students passing tests, thereby showing they have acquired specific knowledge and skills.
Contrasting with data from other surveys [ 13- 17, 30- 36] are the high levels of satisfaction with the programme and the workload and the high level of academic performance.
The programme demonstrated good feasibility, with a mean attendance rate of 5.33 out of 6 sessions, a mean rating by participants on overall satisfaction with the programme of 7.21 out of 10 (SD = 1.89), and a 93% concurrence between the contents of the sessions and the contents of the treatment manual.
The main areas to be explored will be participants' interpretation of study information and documentation, their experiences, expectations and satisfaction with the programme of care, and acceptability of being involved in the trial.
The main areas to be explored will be subjects' reasons for participation in the trial, their interpretation of study information and documentation, their experiences, expectations and satisfaction with the programme of care including barriers/motivators to participation in the relevant programme.
22 It has been previously pilot tested with parents of at risk toddlers, 23 24 showing a high degree of parental satisfaction with the programme's format, content, and outcomes.
