Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Our aim was to summarise the level of satisfaction of each item in the sample of papers examined and not to show the "quality" of each of the articles considered.
Similar(59)
The patients will select their level of satisfaction for each item on a Likert-type scale that varies from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) or use the option "not applicable", with high scores representing high satisfaction [ 28, 29].
Respondents indicate their degree of satisfaction with each item on a 5-point Likert scale.
The patient chooses his or her level of satisfaction with each item by selecting a Likert-like scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree") or by choosing option "not applicable," where high scores represent high satisfaction [ 45].
Table 2 displays the multivariate GEE analysis for total satisfaction and each item score of the CSQ-8.
Where satisfaction of an item was not possible by observation, a response obtained by staff questioning was accepted.
During the 45 60 minute interviews, patients rated the importance or relevance of each item to their satisfaction with their medication using a 5-point scale (where 1 was most important and 5 was not important at all).
The level of satisfaction or degree of agreement for each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale.
Additionally, in order to assess the nurse-physician level of satisfaction an item was added which asks nurses and physicians to rate their level of satisfaction.
Among the 14 items of satisfaction, only one item had more than 4% of missing values (6.3%).
The items were categorized into four basic constructs: job satisfaction (2 items), workload (4 items), level of involvement in direct patient care (1 item) and intention to leave (2 items).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com