On the basis of a predefined questionnaire (0 5 grading scale), ICU staff satisfaction level was high.
In the present study, responses regarding the level of satisfaction were graded on a 5-point Likert scale (very satisfied, moderately satisfied, neutral, moderately dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied) whereas in other studies satisfaction was graded on a 2 or 3-point Likert scale (without the answer option "neutral"); consequently, patients had to choose between 'satisfied' or 'not satisfied'.
The final functional outcome was completed by questionnaires including Odom's criteria [12] which categorized patients' satisfaction into four grades: excellent, good, fair and poor.
Motivations behind improving curricula can be student satisfaction and student grades.
Positive secondary outcomes are life satisfaction, happiness, school grades and attitude, and participation in friendship groups.
There are some studies dealing with number of MS and class sizes with some contradictory results such as changes in students' satisfaction and test grades [ 25].
Moreover, considerable weight is now placed on student evaluations of teaching received which may reflect their personal satisfaction related to grades assigned to their work, rather than the merit of the teaching by the scholar and the curriculum.
Not only do you get the satisfaction of good grades, you get paid too.
In this five-grade system, scores of 0 and 1 indicated poor willingness or satisfaction, a score of 2 indicated fair willingness or satisfaction, a score of 3 indicated good willingness or satisfaction, and a score of 4 indicated excellent willingness or satisfaction.
The primary operator was asked to grade satisfaction with the device in relation to the following attributes: usability of the delivery system; device deployment; device visibility under fluoroscopy; and ease of repositioning, if attempted.
