In addition to a description of the types of provider payment methods used by CBI, our review covers the evidence on the impact of the payment methods on CBI performance, including provider participation, satisfaction and retention; the quantity and quality of care provided through the CBI; the cost and financial sustainability of CBI; patient satisfaction with care; and enrolment rates in CBI.
We find initial evidence that provider payment methods can effect provider satisfaction, the quantity and quality of services provided, patient demand for CBI services and CBI performance outcomes (coverage, risk pooling and sustainability).
The evidence suggests that provider payment impacts CBI performance through provider participation and support for CBI, population enrolment and patient satisfaction with CBI, quantity and quality of services provided and provider and patient retention.
Existing evidence suggests that the method of provider payment can impact the performance of community-based health insurance (CBI), through provider participation and support for CBI, population enrolment and patient satisfaction with CBI, quantity and quality of services provided, and provider and patient retention.
Questions were added to include information on health-care providers' area of work, hours, and quantity of work, satisfaction with services pre- and post-earthquake, and ability to find employment post-earthquake (see Appendix).
According to the evidence, provider payment can affect provider participation, satisfaction and retention in CBI; the quantity and quality of services provided to CBI patients; patient demand of CBI services; and population enrollment, risk pooling and financial sustainability of CBI.
Our review suggests that the method of provider payment has the potential to also be an important determinant of CBI sustainability, through mechanisms such as provider participation, satisfaction and retention in CBI; the quantity and quality of services provided to CBI patients; patient demand for CBI services; and population enrolment, risk pooling and financial sustainability of CBI.
As is the case of any market, consumer satisfaction (or the lack of it) limits the nature and quantity of the material produced and circulated.
In this the task of counting hangers, items and pallets can be eliminated and quantity can be controlled up to 100% satisfaction level.
It has been shown that the satisfaction of the recipients was mainly dependent on the quality and quantity of information given by the consultant, and that the evaluation of coping strategies of recipients was essential to minimize emotional consequences.
