Sentence examples for sar compared to from inspiring English sources

Immobilization in 10% PVA hydrogels led to a higher reduction of SAR compared to the usage of 1% agarose gels, indicating a higher degree of immobilization and therefore a stronger inhibition of Brownian relaxation.

A similar reduction in GUS activity was observed in mesophyll cells of inoculated or systemic leaves collected from plants induced for SAR compared to untreated or mock-inoculated leaves.

In particular, the potential of the low frequency domain (1 2 GHz) of L-band spaceborne SAR, when compared to applications of shorter wavelengths of C, S and X band SAR, is obvious for the purpose of subsurface mapping.

Moreover, SAR status did not affect the investigated physiological endpoints of sensory irritation: While eye-blink recordings confirmed weak ocular irritation properties of ammonia at 0 40 ppm, this effect was not enhanced in SAR subjects compared to controls.

A replicate experiment is shown in Figure 6B in which the transgenic lines displayed a 7- to 8-fold SAR response compared to 5-fold in Ws.

In contrast, as described above, compounds 1– 5 are more complex in structure and these structural differences result in considerably altered SAR for 1– 5 compared to the simpler NP fragments (Table 1).

No significant differences were observed in this peak Ca2+ response to histamine in coverslides exposed to any of the 7 SARs tested when compared to controls (F 7,185) = 1.23, p = .29); shown in Figure 5C.

To investigate the efficacy and safety of an investigational integrin antagonist (SAR 1118) ophthalmic solution compared to placebo (vehicle) in subjects with dry eye disease.

Zolkos et al. [26] compared more than 70 studies for AGB estimation and concluded that airborne LiDAR methods provide a higher accuracy compared to SAR or optical data.

The SP-D level in BALF of IPF patients was significantly decreased compared to SAR patients with univariate and multivariate analysis.

If activity cliff information is utilized, is there an "SAR evolution advantage" detectable compared to other optimization efforts not involving activity cliff compounds?