'sampling should be' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
For example, "Sampling should be done regularly to ensure accuracy."
They say that sampling should be allowed under fair use of copyrighted material, or that a system of fair compensation should be created to allow for sampling.
They say the sampling should be done only in the most serious crimes, as opposed to cases like civil disobedience and subway turnstile jumping.
There are many reasons why Lord Justice Sedley's call for mandatory DNA sampling should be firmly opposed, most were well rehearsed in the comments following James Randerson's post yesterday.
Loads estimated from intermittent sampling should be treated with caution.
Risk-based sampling should be encouraged, and results from risk-based and random sampling should be reported separately.
Sampling should be performed with a more systematic description of the basic population.
Sampling should be seasonally matched (spring/autumn) and performed according to available ISO guidelines.
Consequently, Robergs et al. [30] suggested that "time-averaged sampling should be no longer than 30 s" while "breath-averaged sampling should be" performed by "15-breath running averages".
This implies that a combination of throat and nose sampling should be used to detect SA carriage.
According to the Shannon theorem and for the ULF band ( Hz) the maximal spatial sampling should be done every m.
Indeed, a systematic process of sampling should be established to support the identification of representative samples from adequate sampling frames.
