Blood samples within sampling day and steer were pooled for analyses.
An example is sampling day in case study 3 (Figure 10).
The experiment was performed twice independently for a randomized design of growth environment, sampling day, and physiological analysis.
Windrow temperature at 30 cm depth of piles was measured using a mercury thermometer on each gas sampling day.
We tested the effect of applying different sampling approaches (sampling day, time of day, collector experience and method) on species richness, abundance, and composition.
In PAR, differences in relative abundance of genes related to both stimulation and inhibition of mammary growth were observed to depend on dietary treatment, sampling day, or both.
On sampling day 0, virus was detected in 11/15 (73.3%) calves, and on sampling day 8, it was detected in 4/15 (26.7%) calves.
There was a treatment × sampling day interaction for serum TBARS concentrations (P < 0.05).
However, this significance was lost by sampling day 14 (data not shown).
One to 8 samples were taken per sampling day and abattoir.
No effect of sampling day was evident by unweighted unifrac (Table 1).
