Exact(11)
Sampling completeness from the primary and duplicate samplers was 90% and 84%, respectively.
Species accumulation curves indicate that sampling completeness was 91%; fifty species were recorded, with Satyrinae: Satyrini the richest group (15 species), and Heliconiinae the poorest subfamily (8 species).
Our sampling completeness is estimated at ≈91% for invaded areas and ≈84% for non-invaded areas of the species sampleable given the methods.
Good's coverage is an estimator of sampling completeness and calculates the probability that a randomly selected amplicon sequence from a sample has already been sequenced.
Sampling completeness was assessed by Good's Coverage estimator [30] and estimates of species richness were calculated using the non-parametric estimators ACE (abundance-based coverage estimator [31]) and Chao1 [32].
Good's coverage estimates sampling completeness by calculating the probability that a randomly selected read from a sample had been sequenced.
Similar(49)
Samples with greater than 110% PABA recovery were designated unsatisfactory, because additional sources of PABA may have been consumed (e.g. a multivitamin) and an accurate determination of sample completeness could therefore not be made.
The estimated sample coverage, which is a measure of sample completeness (Good 1953), and the Chao-1 index, which is an estimator of asymptotic species richness (Chao 1984), were also computed with the iNEXT package.
While the number of sequence reads obtained would seem to have been sufficient to produce a complete picture of the family, a caveat to this proposition arises from uncertainty about sample completeness.
We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private mailed survey conditions ranging from potentially identifiable to completely anonymous on survey response and on respondents' representativeness of the underlying sampling frame, completeness in answering sensitive survey items, and disclosure of sensitive information.
These microarrays were serially sectioned (4 μm), and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to verify tissue sampling and completeness.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com