Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
No mammalian DNA was found, he added, though that could be because, compared with DNA from insects and vegetation, there is far less of it and the samples were very small.
The three samples were very similar.
Overall the two samples were very similar.
Few samples were very hard with TH above 300 (19.2 %).
All samples were very closely related to the reference Lordsdale virus genome sequence.
The properties of the laboratory-prepared samples were very close to the industrial ones.
The remaining groundwater samples were very hard (greater than 180 mg/L as CaCO3) in nature.
The whole and acid-soluble samples were very similar, as characterized by NMR and FTICR-MS.
The overall results of color fastness to rubbing of all samples were very good.
The overall results of color fastness to wash of dyed samples were very good shown in Table 4.
However, the estimated indirect bandgap values (3.16 to 3.20 eV) for all the samples were very close to the reported indirect bandgap value of anatase [29].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com