Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
A biplot of the first principal component (PC1) versus the second principal component (PC2) is shown in Fig. 4, where the samples were displayed as points, and the variables were displayed as a vector.
Samples were displayed using an arbitrary 10-fold change cut-off for subsequent assessment for quantitative real time PCR analysis.
To make a square mosaic, the first 625 cells from each of these samples were displayed in a 25×25 matrix of images.
Samples were displayed on log forward-angle versus log side-angle light scatter plots.
Then, genetic similarities among population samples were displayed using the Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA), as calculated in MEGA 4 [ 45].
Biological samples were analyzed in triplicate: day 0 samples were centered at 1, and day 2, 7, and 28 samples were displayed as fold change relative to day 0. A t-test was used to evaluate statistical significance.
Similar(54)
All samples are displayed in Table 1.
The results for the samples are displayed in Figure 5.
The locations of groundwater samples are displayed in (Fig. 1).
SEM micrographs of these samples are displayed in Figure 6.
Raman spectra of the samples are displayed in Fig. 2b.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com