Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
samples were collected from
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "samples were collected from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific or research contexts to indicate the source or location from which samples were taken for analysis or study. Example: "In this study, samples were collected from various locations to assess the environmental impact."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Those samples were collected from anonymous donors using vans parked throughout the neighborhood.
News & Media
Blood samples were collected from 1549 animals.
Nine samples were collected from each company.
The rock samples were collected from Khersan 2 dam site.
Further blood samples were collected from the foot vein.
Following slaughter, blood samples were collected from each animal.
Science
Serum samples were collected from acute and convalescent patients.
Peripheral whole blood samples were collected from healthy volunteers.
Science
Blood samples were collected from 564 animals from 35 herds.
In total, 27 samples were collected from both vineyards.
Samples were collected from living areas, basements and window wells.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "samples were collected from", ensure that the source or location is clearly and specifically identified to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity. For example, specify "the river", "the patients", or "the experimental group".
Common error
Avoid using overly general terms like "various places" or "different locations" when specifying where "samples were collected from". Be precise about the source to provide context and ensure reproducibility of the research or analysis.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "samples were collected from" serves as a passive construction indicating the origin of the samples. Ludwig AI's response confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage.
Frequent in
Science
86%
News & Media
7%
Formal & Business
7%
Less common in
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "samples were collected from" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, particularly within scientific and research contexts, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It serves to specify the origin or source of samples used in a study or analysis. While alternatives like "samples were obtained from" or "samples were taken from" exist, the core meaning remains consistent. When employing this phrase, clarity and precision in identifying the sample source are paramount. This phrase maintains a formal and scientific register, lending itself well to academic and professional communications.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
samples were obtained from
Replaces "collected" with "obtained", suggesting acquisition rather than just gathering.
samples were taken from
Uses "taken" instead of "collected", implying a removal or extraction of samples.
samples were sourced from
Employs "sourced", highlighting the origin or where the samples came from.
samples were gathered from
Substitutes "collected" with "gathered", indicating an accumulation of samples.
samples were drawn from
Uses "drawn" to imply that the samples were extracted or pulled from a specific place.
samples originated from
Focuses on the place where the samples began or started.
samples were acquired from
Highlights that the samples were gained or procured from a specific source.
samples were harvested from
Suggests that the samples were carefully gathered, often in a natural or agricultural context.
samples were recovered from
Implies that the samples were found or retrieved from a specific location, possibly after being lost or hidden.
samples were extracted from
Emphasizes that the samples were removed or separated from a larger substance or place.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "samples were collected from" in a scientific paper?
In scientific writing, you can replace "samples were collected from" with more formal alternatives such as "samples were "were obtained from"", "samples "were derived from"", or "samples "were extracted from"" for a more precise and academic tone.
Is it acceptable to use "samples were gathered from" instead of "samples were collected from"?
Yes, "samples were gathered from" is an acceptable alternative. "Gathered" implies an accumulation or bringing together of samples from a source. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey, but both phrases are generally interchangeable.
What is the difference between "samples were collected from" and "samples were taken from"?
The phrases "samples were collected from" and "samples "were taken from"" are very similar in meaning. "Taken" can sometimes imply a more forceful or direct removal of samples, but in most contexts, they are used interchangeably.
When should I use "samples were sourced from" instead of "samples were collected from"?
"Samples were sourced from" is best used when you want to emphasize the origin or the supply chain of the samples. It highlights where the samples originated, making it suitable for contexts where the source's characteristics or reliability are important.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested