Sentence examples for samples we define from inspiring English sources

Given indices of samples with actual positive assigned labels (A_{j}^) for the (j -th class label and corresponding set of indices with predicted positive labels (Y_{j -thfor a total of (M) samples, we define performanclasstrics using Eqs.

If this ratio is larger (or smaller, depending on the measure) than 95% of the ratios in 10,000 randomizations of the samples, we define the correlation between lineage and this set to be significant.

Combining all the unmethylated regions of eight samples, we define such CGIs as U-CGIs if there are more than 100 bp overlap between the CGIs and these unmethylated regions.

For reduced and alkylated samples we defined carbamidomethylation of cysteins as fixed modification in the database search.

Considering a particular gene and its vector of expression values across samples, we defined Q1 and Q3 to be the first and third quartile of this vector.

In 5.5% (5/91) of samples, we defined 10.9 Mbp minimal region of gain (MRG) in 1q21.2 1q23 including CKS1B and ANP32E, two genes associated with poor prognosis in MM.

To analyze sequencing results for both NRO and total RNA samples, we defined read depth as the number of sequencing reads acquired per base, normalized by the total bases sequenced for that sample.

Because many participants did not provide fasting blood samples, we defined diabetes as a fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or a nonfasting plasma glucose of ≥ 200 mg/dl.

Because high expression of HSP90AA1, HSP90AB1 and HSF1 was driven by amplification, and high-level amplification of HSF1 was associated with higher expression of HSP90 in un-amplified HSP90 samples, we defined up-regulated HSP90 as a collection of samples with the top 10% high expression value of HSP90AA1 and/or HSP90AB1, and the top 20% higher expression of HSF1.

Using all 4,010 samples, we defined the gene expression level at each probe set as low-level expression (bottom 10% low expression value), intermediate-level expression (middle 80% expression value) and high-level expression (top 10% high expression value), and compared survival differences among those three groups using Cox-regression survival analyses.

For the stars in the Isaacson and Fischer56 sample, we define main-sequence stars as stars with absolute visual magnitude within 1 magnitude of the main sequence.