Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
In both samples we compare the recorded measures to the self-reported measures to determine the extent and the nature of measurement error in BMI.
Using a data set with 16,353 samples, we compare HAPI-UR to Beagle, MaCH, IMPUTE2, and SHAPEIT and show that HAPI-UR runs 18× faster than all methods and has a lower switch-error rate than do other methods except for Beagle; with the use of consensus phasing, running HAPI-UR three times gives a slightly lower switch-error rate than Beagle does and is more than six times faster.
Several new assays have been developed for high-risk HPV testing of cervical samples; we compare six HPV tests in a screening population.
Furthermore, in a subset of samples, we compare Prenatal-BoBs results with the results from aCGH in cases in which the test was prescribed.
Similar(56)
For the three test samples, we compared extraction platform ease of use and DNA yields.
Using a larger specially designed test samples, we compared room temperature fluctuations and heat capacities for rooms finished with the PCM plaster and conventional plasterboard.
To explain the contrast in the dispersion of the dielectric function between amorphous and crystalline Ge-Sb-Te samples, we compared our experimental results with data from [18].
To investigate the effects of air plasma on moisture and pH of pistachio samples, we compared moisture and pH of uncontaminated pistachio samples with or without air plasma treatment.
In order to assess the performance of each treatment in recovering or extracting metabolites from urine samples, we compared the number of compounds identified across treatments and assessed the classes of compounds more likely to be extracted per treatment.
To determine the accuracy of our algorithm in biological samples, we compared different possible subcellular colocalization patterns (Fig. 3).
To assess the impact of S100A6 and S100A11 as discriminatory signals for different tumorous tissue samples, we compared the spectra derived from different sample groups in individual assays.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com