Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(19)
An F-Test for the significance of the difference between the variances of the two Samples was significant (F = 1.71; p = 0.01).
Moreover, the adsorption capacity for dye molecules with different size on these activated samples was significant higher than that on commercial activated carbons and a synthetic ordered mesoporous carbon.
Double stars indicated the difference between the two samples was significant.
The effect of flour type and fermentation time on the L-lactic acid and acetic acid contents of tarhana samples was significant (P < 0.05).
A DEG was defined as an expressed gene for which 1) the difference of signal intensity between treatment and control samples was greater than 1.5-fold and 2) the difference in gene expression between the 2 samples was significant at P-value ≤ 0.05 by a paired t test (permutation: all; FDR collection: adjusted Bonferroni method).
No comparison of measures of genetic diversity between pre and post-epidemic samples was significant for Lokoué and for Lossi (Table 1).
Similar(41)
These findings suggest that differences in gene expression between the corresponding samples were significant.
However, structural differences between individual animal samples are significant, so the conditions of evaluation or training differ for each trial.
Furthermore, the standard deviation values that emerged in our statistical analysis of the two samples were significant in some cases, thereby demonstrating that there is a considerable dispersion around the mean measurements for each tooth, especially in terms of torque.
By contrast, pairwise FST between pre, post-epidemic, and periphery samples were significant for the Lossi population (Table 3).
No pairwise FST or Dest comparisons between migrant Padre Island temporal samples were significant across sampling periods, indicating stable allele frequency distributions over a 22-year period.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com