Suggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Interrogation of the Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA, Cell 2015 24 which contains 1,105 samples was performed using cBioPortal.
The analysis of samples was performed using HPLC instrument (Agilent) equipped with a Rezex RPM-Monosaccharide Pb2+ column (300 × 7.8 mm; particle size 8 μm) at 80 °C.
The characterization of the samples was performed using nuclear reaction analysis and Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy.
A complete morphological characterization of the samples was performed using XRD, TEM, SEM, N2 adsorption and surface hydrophilicity measurements.
A blinded study of 163 samples was performed using this new assay and it was concordant with the original methods.
The two-groups comparison, each group consisting of n = 4 independent samples, was performed using the genewise negative binomial generalized linear model with quasi-likelihood tests (glmQLfit) implemented in EdgeR.
Assessment of pathway activity in single AML samples was performed using a single-sample gene set enrichment method which aggregates z-score transformed gene expression values of a given gene set into a single pathway activity score34.
Taxonomic profiling of the metagenomic samples was performed using MetaPhlAn220, which uses a library of clade-specific markers to provide panmicrobial (bacterial, archaeal, viral, and eukaryotic) profiling (http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/metaphlan2).edu/metaphlan2
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of SiO2 samples was performed using a JEOL-JEM microscope model 2100.
An assessment of form change in pre- and post-milling samples was performed using PXRD.
The method used for detection of yeast and fungi in samples was performed using dilution plating method.
More suggestions(12)
models was performed using
papers was performed using
templates was performed using
samples was removed using
samples was performed utilizing
sizes was performed using
materials was performed using
samples was accomplished using
specimens was performed using
lists was performed using
testing was performed using
sampling was performed using
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com