Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
The pooled standard deviation of the kinetic data, using different prepared samples, was less than 10%.
The measurement error of the equipment for replicate samples was less than 1%.
Carry-over between samples was less than 5%, the peak height RSD was 2.92% (n = 15).
Within-run and between-run precision for all QC samples was less than 5.0% and 10.4%, respectively.
But the dN/dS ratio for our samples was less than one on comparing them with reported subtype C and representative sequences of different clades, strongly emphasizing the necessity of sequence conservation at different disease stages and even across clades.
The wear loss of the implanted samples was less than that of untreated ones, and an optional dose of 5 × 1017 cm− 2 could be used for the wear resistance improvement.
The deviation of the results from the mean value of the samples was less than 1.53% for RLMs.
The particle size of samples was less than 4 mm as against FCO value of minimum 90%%.
The hardness of the water samples was less than 75 mg/L indicating soft nature of groundwater.
Total hardness of majority of samples was less than the WHO guideline value of 500 mg/l as CaCO3 (WHO 2011).
The reaction (cationic and anionic balance) error (E) of all the groundwater samples was less than the accepted limit of ±10%, an added proof for the precision of the data (Matthess 1982; Domenico and Schwartz 1990).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com