Suggestions(2)
Exact(6)
In TBBPA treated samples, the growth of the two microalgae was significantly inhibited at the three highest concentrations (9.2, 12.9 and 16.5 μM) in the two tests.
At the interfaces within both samples, the growth of the reaction product proceeds parabolically from the very beginning but with remarkably different rates.
In all samples the growth of L. monocytogenes ATCC 19115 is progressive from 1 to 10 days, exception sample 4% CHBT where is registered a constant inhibition of pathogen.
Combining the TEM, HRTEM, and XRD results, for 2-h-reaction samples, the growth of NaYF4 shell with thickness of 2.5 nm and the appearance of hexagonal NaYF4 lattice fringes and diffraction peaks could preliminarily confirmed the formation of hexagonal NaYF4 shells on the cubic NaGdF4 cores.
Upon loading trace amount of α nucleating agent PTBBNa in samples the growth rate of two forms can be strictly compared in the same melting and crystallization temperature condition, the results reveal that the growth rate of β form is faster than that of α form in sPS and BzsPS-2BzsPS-2%
(5) In the F1 generation from the May and September samples, the growth periods to pupation and to eclosion were longer in the samples collected from the localities closer to the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP.
Similar(54)
The needle has been milled in such a way that the needle axis coincides with the [001] direction in the sample (the growth direction).
Upon cold-crystallization of stretched PTT sample, the growth of crystalline phase along the stretching direction was much faster than those along the perpendicular directions.
For this water sample, the Growth Direct System saved almost 2 days compared to the traditional 3 day test (Figure 13A).
In the second sample the growth was sparse, and could easily have been overlooked.
By sampling the growth solution at various points in the synthesis, many nanobelts were found to grow and elongate out of central nuclei.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com