Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(24)
Applying the filters onto the spectra of new samples, the difference between samples of different class can be obtained and the difference can be used for discrimination of these samples.
The values for the ratio increased systematically, but for the 2 largest samples the difference became very small, the averages for different sample sizes being 0.868, 0.910, 0.926, and 0.933, respectively (a positively decelerated curve).
Loci of distance-class D5 (>50 cM) in the domesticated samples showed a significantly lower level of LD (MD: χ = 9.2; P = 0.002; AD: χ = 15.5; P = 8 × 10−5; Wilcoxon nonparametric test) than loci located in different chromosomes (inter-chromosomal LD), whereas in the wild samples, the difference in the level of LD between the two classes considered was not significant.
Compared to the untreated samples, the difference is over 60-fold.
As observed in the case of the stick-shaped samples, the difference in capillary rise height between the interior and exterior of the core was small, which was confirmed by observing how the wetting at the top of the core spread at the completion of the capillary rise.
Although promoter methylation was also increased in alcohol-related and unknown-risk HCC samples, the difference did not reach statistical significance.
Similar(36)
To compare EpCAM expression of different samples, the differences in Δ Ct of individual samples (ΔΔ Ct) were used (A2780 was set at 1).
Although intially evident in most large Western samples, the differences often disappear when key variables are controlled.
Although there were differences in terms of estimates of Campylobacter numbers between the methods and samples, the differences between culture and real-time PCR were not statistically significant for most of the samples used in this study.
In the LYSIS samples the differences in expression were most pronounced.
In the matched samples, the differences between both groups were considerably smaller for most of the variables.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com