Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Same experimental procedure was followed to prepare other samples, the changes being the variation in the treatment reagent and its composition.
In comparison to the well processed samples the changes in the b* values were accompanied by significant changes in the L* values, corresponding to a more yellow but darker appearance.
For genes considered detectable in the majority of microarray samples, the changes in gene expression observed by microarray and rt-PCR had excellent correlation.
Concerning the HHP treated samples, the changes for all colour parameters were observed earlier in comparison with the control (i.e., at the 15th day of storage) and were more intense (Table 2).
To further clarify the dynamic change in tumor infiltration by lymphocytes in patient samples, the changes in CD8+ TIL and FOXP3+ TIL caused by chemotherapy compared with baseline in biopsy specimens were determined for the first time in this study.
However, because of the heterogeneity of the clinical samples, the changes of the gene expression levels may be not only caused by the changes in the status of the cancer cells but also by those of the cells unrelated to the cancers.
Similar(54)
Among the six samples, the change in degree of fit (χ 2) was not significant after constraining factor loadings to be equal in males and females.
For the two considered samples the change of the non-specific contribution clearly dominates the observed change of the median chip intensity resulting in a stronger median signal of the scg-sample.
The subsequent t test for dependent samples showed the changes in both groups from pretest to posttest (see Table 6).
However, because of the sample size, the changes over time were only statistically significant for participants.
Therefore for human samples the fold change was the ratio against the pool of human normal samples while for the dog samples the fold change was the ratio against the pool of dog normal samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com