Suggestions(2)
Exact(6)
Among the six samples, the change in degree of fit (χ 2) was not significant after constraining factor loadings to be equal in males and females.
On the other hand, for both samples, the change in the intensity of the transmitted light of the tapered POF coated with ZnO nanostructures decreases linearly with relative humidity.
For the two considered samples the change of the non-specific contribution clearly dominates the observed change of the median chip intensity resulting in a stronger median signal of the scg-sample.
In the CVR and COPD samples the change in the number of days per week with more than 30 minutes of physical activity was positive and statistically significant (0.33 and 0.37 respectively).
As mentioned before, in both samples, the change in competence at T3 remains statistically significant, comparing with T0, despite the decline (except for SPs' assessment of the 2008 group, where, as mentioned earlier, no change reached statistical significance).
In spot samples, the change between P20 and P36 was +31 ± 9% (P = 0.0005) and 9 ± 10% (P = 0.4), respectively; which was a difference of 15% in the change adjusted for the ratio at P20, which was not significant (P = 0.1).
Similar(54)
Same experimental procedure was followed to prepare other samples, the changes being the variation in the treatment reagent and its composition.
In comparison to the well processed samples the changes in the b* values were accompanied by significant changes in the L* values, corresponding to a more yellow but darker appearance.
For genes considered detectable in the majority of microarray samples, the changes in gene expression observed by microarray and rt-PCR had excellent correlation.
Current voltage characteristics of the samples showed the change in barrier height.
Therefore for human samples the fold change was the ratio against the pool of human normal samples while for the dog samples the fold change was the ratio against the pool of dog normal samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com