Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
However, our online course did not achieve an effect size as high as those found in psychopharmacological treatment research with clinical samples (ranging between 1.59 and 2.34), though we note that these samples start with much higher PSS scores prior to intervention.
Similar(59)
The Kiehl's tradition of copious free samples started with Irving, Mr. Sepulveda said.
For SCAM, we use the Gaussian random walk proposal (q(x_{ell,t}|x_{ell,t-1}) propto exp left (- x_{ell,t}-x_{ell,t-1})^{2}/left (2gamma _{ell,t}^{2}right)right)). In SCAM, the scale parameters γℓ,t are adapted (one for each component) considering all the previous corresponding samples (starting with γℓ,0=1).
All prepared samples started with 3 µg of DNA and were fragmented identically using the Covaris system.
The rest of the samples starting with HMRN are local patients from the HMDS database.
Ideally, quarterly samples, starting with preconception and through 3 years of age, are recommended.
Unless specified otherwise, a series of threefold dilutions of different mouse, cotton rat, or human serum samples, starting with a 1/100 dilution, were loaded on the coated plates.
To test for the significance of an allele-frequency difference between two samples, we first require the joint likelihoods of the observed reads in both samples starting with the assumption of population homogeneity.
A series of 1 2 dilutions of the different serum samples, starting with a 1 400 dilution, were loaded onto the antigen-coated plates in the blocking buffer and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature.
Serially diluted (1 2) assay test samples (starting with serum 1 100, saliva 1 20, fecal fluid approximately 50 mg/mL) and controls were added at 0.1 mL/well and incubated at 4°C overnight.
Sumai 3 samples; starting with a low level induction at 8 hai, followed by a consistent increase up to the peak at 32 or 48 hai and showing a continuous downtrend thereafter.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com