Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(12)
For one, dataset, explicitly simulating spillover improved the agreement between input functions estimated with two blood samples (p value =0.03), but distributions of RMS norm values were not significantly different for input functions estimated with and without spillover for the other five datasets.
Also expression levels of PTRF were significantly higher in normal tissue compared to tumor tissue samples (p value ≤0.0001, Online Resource 22).
The four most commonly used cell lines (i.e., HepG2, HuH 7, Hep3B and PLC/PRF/5) [ 19] have significantly high correlations with the tumor samples (P value < 0.05).
And there were no significant differences of RIN scores between disease (SZ or BD) and control samples (P value =0.81 and 0.67, respectively, two-tailed Student t test).
A one-way ANOVA on the resistance patterns of these isolates yielded highly significant variation among the iceberg lettuce samples (P value < 0.001).
GM- CSF expression was very low and did not differ between breast tumor samples and normal tissue samples (p value = 0.49, Online Resource 23).
Similar(48)
Regression results showed consistent and robust association between sanitation success and education for the national, rural and socio-political samples (p values 0.018 0.038).
Statistical significance was evaluated by Student's t-test for paired samples; p values <.05 (two-sided) were considered statistically significant.
*p = 0.0001 for eschar swab sample vs. skin biopsy sample; p value not available for other parameters.
Accordingly, the GATA motif is the top motif enriched in the HudsonAlpha sample (P value < 1 e −1216), whereas the REST-NRSF motif is the top enriched motif in the Broad sample (P value < 1 e −275).
The fact that randomly picked locations had slightly higher Ct values in the VPA sample (p value = 1.1e−11) compared to vehicle may reflect a general effect on chromatin accessibility after VPA treatment.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com