Sentence examples for samples outcome from inspiring English sources

Therefore the full model developed by the two-stage variable selection (Table 2) was adopted as the final model for the litter samples outcome.

In the final model for the litter samples outcome (Table 2), none of the random effects factors appeared to significantly contribute to the variability observed in the response (Wald type test p-value>0.300 p-value>0.300he forr factors).

Of the dichotomous risk factors retained for the litter samples outcome from the screening step, the soil capabilities to produce habitats suitable for coniferous hardwood trees and woodland wildlife were completely collinear; only the former was used further.

Of the numerical and ordered risk factors retained for the litter samples outcome from the screening step of analysis, the total water capacity of the soil profile, soil pH, erodibility K-factor and wind erodibility ordered grouping (WEG) were each pair-wise collinear with the primary farmland classification (as defined in the STATSGO) for the soil map unit.

As with the subset of risk factors used for building the final model for the litter samples outcome: i) the total water capacity of the soil profile and soil pH were collinear but both were preserved for further analysis; and ii) the soil capabilities to produce habitats for coniferous hardwood trees and woodland wildlife were completely collinear, and only the former was used further.

Next, the risk factors remaining for the litter samples outcome modelling, were offered to the basic model as the fixed effects factors all at once for the second step of the variable selection (i.e. after each model fit the fixed effects factor with the highest p-value was removed until a model with all the fixed effects risk factors significant at p<0.050 was obtained).

We used linear regression models to assess bivariate associations between demographic, behavioral, and environmental variables and TBB and TBPH in handwipes and TBBA in urine samples (outcomes were log10-transformed).

Univariate analysis showing no additional study variable was associated with sampling outcome (Table 3).

Fig. 2 Sample outcome of FSA tag identification frames (N=4 and L=4).

Threshold drug dose for detecting an effect on sampling outcome was determined by a Receiving Operator Curve (Sampling success/Drug dose) and a Youden test [21].

Table 1 Prediction of case control status using Polygenic Risk Score Reference Discovery sample Target sample Outcome Ruderfer et al. [51] 2794 cases (SCZ) and 2976 controls 334 cases (SCZ) and 360 controls Variance explained by SCZ PRS was 5%.