Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(10)
For "future" predictions (i.e., for samples not included in the original test set) RANSAC provides a statistical estimate for the probability of obtaining reliable predictions, i.e., predictions within a pre-defined number of standard deviations from the true values.
This means defining the assembly of the dataset,, and the criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of a hypothesis, h, at modeling f when processing input samples not included in .
In addition, a further 69 samples, not included in round one, were analyzed (21 stage I, eight stage II, 36 benign, three normal healthy and one colon cancer).
Control samples not included in statistical analysis.
Regarding samples not included in the Passing-Bablok analysis, discordant results between the SRM assay and the nephelometric immunoassay were obtained for only one serum.
Also from synapse, I retrieved the mutations detected in 34 pancreatic carcinoma samples, not included within the datasets of somatic mutations obtained from IntOGen.
Similar(50)
F det varied widely from 10 to ~100 mg/cm2/year (Fig. 5 D); in samples including event layers, F det shows maxima ranged from 10too 100 mg/cm2/year, whereas it ranged from 10 ~ 35 mg/cm2/year in samples not including event layers.
Based on a correction of 0 30% RSD (QC sample not included), the LOESS value was used for PCA analysis (Fig. 3).
The models were then used to predict the average response to the remaining song or ml noise sample not included in the estimation set.
Of the three surfaces sampled not included in the analysis, two surfaces in one room could not be evaluated due to interruption by patient admission, and for one surface ACC was not adequately obtained.
A comparison of the final sample (N = 3,220) considered in multivariate analysis and the sample not included due to missing data on AMDP (N = 2,004) showed some differences: We had relatively less completed data from psycho-geriatric patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com