Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
For Energy Dispersive X-ray FluorEDXRFce (EDXRF) measurement of elements, the preparation of water samples involved the absorption of a certain amount of the sample on weighed amount of dry analar grade Whatman cellulose powder.
Apart from the stage of maturation the main difference between these samples involved the presence of granulosa cells.
An additional problem with some dust samples involved the presence of interfering compounds (i.e., compounds that coeluted with the target analyte), creating uncertainty and prohibiting assignment of specific concentrations.
Despite the small numbers of samples involved, the fact that these combinations of chromosomes have been reported in more than one study may imply that they could be important in the development of NSCLC.
The data points that are included in Fig. 2 ▶ which have values of a that continue the linear trend beyond x = 0.333 are from Kukkadapu et al. (1997 ▶) whose samples involved the terephthalate dianion, C6H4 COO− 2, as the charge-compensating interlayer ion.
Similar(55)
All the 2KWBPU samples involve the use of a water-dispersible polyisocyanate resin based on HDI.
When determining endogenous compounds in biological samples, the lack of blank or analyte-free matrix samples involves the use of alternative strategies for calibration and quantitation.
All the differences between samples involve the second principal component (PC2) which, however, accounts for only a small portion of the spectral variability.
Analyses of environmental and biological samples involve the same general steps, although some matrix-dependent refinement is often necessary.
Methods were developed to multiplex samples, involving the addition of a different unique short barcode sequence to each sample during library preparation.
Predictions of chemosensitivity (in the validation samples involving the Wang and Miller cohorts) were then evaluated by using methods previously described [ 7] producing estimated relative probabilities and associated measures of uncertainty across the validation samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com