Suggestions(1)
Exact(28)
Curve numbers correspond to the samples in Table 1.
It is obvious that the right recognition cannot be made if we adopt testing samples in Table 2.
The model was used to predict the 99 samples in Table 1 that were left out of the model building procedure.
All the sediment samples in Table 1 have similar nanoparticulates, along with lesser amounts of nanoparticulates with different morphologies (as yet unidentified).
The percentage of methaqualone, phenacetin, paracetamol and saccharin in a typical illicit drug sample as well as simulated samples in Table 5.
Lattice parameters and densities of other samples in Table 1 are expected to be very similar to those of sample 5 as the positions of XRD diffraction peaks are almost identical.
Similar(32)
The samples in Tables 12 and 13 include employed native individuals aged 15 64, who work for salary.
Numbers denote the number of a sample in Table 1.
This allocation can be seen in the column "Proportional sample" in Table 2.
The characteristics of the 4939 individuals are summarized by sample in Table 1.
We presented the background characteristics for the sample in Table 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com