Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Since two of the samples gave very contrasting epitope profiles, they were selected for nucleotide sequencing.
Over 29 working days the control samples gave very constant ratios.
However such sampling methods are impractical in routine practice and we subsequently demonstrated in a retrospective study, that routinely collected serum samples gave very similar mean levels of sICAM-1[ 6].
Similar(57)
High-throughput analysis based on flow cytometry analysis to perform rapid and quantitative processing of samples gives very good results both with Nile red [ 17, 42, 47, 60, 79] and, more recently, BODIPY 505/515 [ 20, 25, 48].
In some cases (~5%), this difference seems to be associated with genes where the genomic DNA reference sample gave very high intensity binding.
For samples that gave very low yields of DNA, we amplified the DNA using GenomiPhi (GE Life sciences).
A sensitivity analysis performed in RCTs also including studies with smaller sample sizes (<300) gave very similar results.
Of the normal breast tissues, only a single sample (5.3% of 19 samples) gave a very weak methylation signal (data not shown) in contrast to all other normal tissues that lacked DKK3 promoter methylation.
The individual donor samples can give very different responses.
Convenience or anecdotal samples may give very useful information.
Samples that give very faint smearing require additional PCR amplification cycles.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com