Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The Wilcoxon test (WC) was applied, using the Bonferroni correction, to identify the occurrence of statistical differences among the samples considering a confidence level of 95%.
A sensitivity analysis was performed using bootstrapping methodology to simulate 100 different samples, considering a uniform distribution of ±10 % in the number of patients with one and two lesions.
Similar(58)
We calculated this sample considering a mean difference of 6° in the lateral incisor angulation as a clinically relevant difference between sides with and without impacted canine.
Table 5 shows the most common chronic health problems in the sample, considering a minimum prevalence of at least 5%.
The DPM counts were carried out for 60 min for each sample, considering a reading window comprising all the energies (0 – 2000 keV counting channels).
70% (n = 7560) was randomly assigned to the developmental sample, and the remaining 30% (n = 3240) to the validation sample, considering a similar proportion of respondents by country in each sample.
In contrast, a fairly low percentage of respondents in the Japanese sample considered a family doctor or GP to be helpful.
The theoretical estimates are validated by numerical samples considering FGM beam as a model problem.
All samples considered have a nominal 5 μm thickness.
Results were analyzed statistically using a two-way ANOVA (StatView 5.0 software, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) with p < 0.05 between samples considered as a significant difference.
We have calculated the sample size considering a type I error of 5 and 80% power; however, the sample number is still relatively small.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com