Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(9)
All samples considered to contain predominantly single clone infections (FWS values of >0.95) were determined to contain either the 3D7-type or Dd2-type deletions, and no genotypes with neither or both deletions were seen.
Palynological analyses were conducted on 41 surface sediments collected in several mudded bays where low-energy conditions prevail, allowing for fine particle decantation, and also on 12 moss samples considered to be pollen rain collectors taken on the periphery of the BB.
Such a percentile represents an estimation of the percentage of data samples considered to be degraded over the total, assuming that the worst values of each variable most likely correspond to UEs having the associated problem.
For genotyping, PCR amplification of the samples considered to be HCV seropositive was attempted using the NS5B region.
For the samples considered to be "methicillin-oxacillin resistant" the E-test was used for confirmation of sensitivity to vancomycin.
The samples considered to be positive in this study should then be considered as highly indicative of anti-lyssavirus specific anti-lyssavirus specific
Similar(51)
A total of 108 DNA-samples considered to be putative individuals from twenty introduced and three native populations (Table 1) were sampled for AFLP fingerprints.
Duplicate clinical examinations were carried out on a randomly selected sub-sample, considered to be representative of the study subjects.
Genes that exhibited differential expression of 2-fold or greater between the compared samples were considered to be significantly enriched in either one of the samples.
Samples were considered to be predominantly marine in origin when for >5 days of a 7-day interval the air masses came from the Atlantic Ocean (Fig. 1a).
In contrast, samples were considered to be predominantly Saharan in origin when for >5 days of a 7-day interval the air masses came from North Africa (Fig. 1b).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com