Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
Calculate lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval using type 1 error, f 2 values of N bootstrap samples, bias correction, and acceleration statistics.
No clinically relevant differences in ACTH levels were observed between cold (28.2 ± 22.3 pg/ml) and warm (24.3 ± 20.6 pg/ml) sampling (bias 3.8 ± 7.3 pg/ml) or between original (22.1 ± 10.8 pg/ml) and defrosted (22.3 ± 10.5 pg/ml) samples (bias 0.2 ± 1.9 pg/ml).
Estimates of wt contamination obtained in repeated analyses (DNA extraction and PCR) of the same validation samples showed CV values ranging from 3.1 to 19.0% and were quite close to the expected values, with average absolute bias for each level lower than 25%, except for the 1% validation samples (bias 29%) (Table 1).
Similar(57)
But even more caution is needed where numbers are small or samples biased.
We used the INDIRECT macro [ 27] to estimate the mediation effect (path axb) and its bootstrapped (1,000 samples), bias-corrected and accelerated 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
One of them is sample bias.
Then, there's the problem of sample bias.
He dealt immediately with the sample bias problem by turning toward statistics.
"Traditional scholars who work at small scale never like to admit they may have a sample bias or a problem of generalisation," he says.
Perhaps Austen had similar thoughts and, in writing Charlotte and Collins, tried to correct for the sample bias created by her parents' luck and success.
And that is itself an error.One big problem is sample bias.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com