Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
In conclusion, the current identified set of 166 genes is suitable to distinguish PSP samples from controls and FTD/PiD disease samples upon expression, furthermore, our results show that FTD/PiD disease samples behave as one group that can be distinguished from PSP samples and non demented controls.
These samples behave as strong gel materials.
Similar(58)
Although all samples behaved as non-reactive some expansion was recorded, especially in the M-CAMBT method.
It was found that from room temperature to about 90 K (depending upon composition) the samples behaved as superparamagnets[1].
The rheometer, consisting of a stress-imposed rheometer coupled with a vibrating cell, generates a Brownian-like motion at a macroscopic scale which makes the sample behave as a non-Newtonian condensed fluid, and allows rheological property measurements of powders which are very sensitive to changes on their surface.
Four sets of mass ratio of coarse-grained particles to silty clay are 0.0, 0.4, 0.4 and 0.6 used to form the frozen samples, and the test results demonstrate that: when the shear stress level is low, the tested sample exhibits an attenuation creep; when the shear stress level is high, the tested sample behaves as a non-attenuation creep.
In the vicinity of Bc, for B < Bc, the sample behaves as a weak insulator in the sense that ρ xx decreases with increasing T. For B > Bc, ρ xx increases with increasing T, characteristic of a quantum Hall state.
This image is essentially diagonal, which means that the sample behaves as a pure depolarizer, without any significant diattenuation or retardation.
Yet, one should be careful with extrapolation of these findings to native neonatal samples as aqueous HSA-based samples behave differently.
As next step, we investigated how proteins from these differently fixed samples behave in western blot analysis.
In higher humidities, the samples behave more ductile.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com